On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Grant Likely wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:43:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:

quoted

The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each
type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <redacted>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <redacted>
---
I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch,
but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch?

Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should
go into the same one.

If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch.

Already upstream

Ok, I see. I've applied both patches to the fixes branch and will send
it out with the next pull request for 3.1 to Linus then.

Sorry, I just noticed that the second patch is not a bug fix, so I took it out
again and kept only patch 1/2 in the fixes branch for 3.1.

Should I take the other one as well? It's probably better to let that
go the proper way through the tegra tree for 3.2, right?

Given that you have a public tree right now, and I don't (since
kernel.org is down), please feel free to start a tegra/for-3.2 branch
for me and apply it there. I'll base further work on top of that if
needed.

(There also aren't a whole lot of other patches queued for 3.2 right now).

-Olof