Re: board identification in /sys
From: David Gibson <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-19 02:23:06
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:15:30PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
I've been paying partial attention to the following thread: http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=131352330625733&w=2 It's an interesting discussion. I realize that moving /proc/device-tree to /sys would probably violate sysrq-rules.txt, but it would be nice to have a common way to represent things like cpu type, board id, etc in /sys that is populated from the DT. I haven't seen that discussed here yet, has anyone considered it?
Seems like a specious argument to me. Despite all the problems of /proc, the contents of /proc/device-tree are perfectly well-defined. Or at least, its problems are entirely its own and not related to the general problems of /proc. The only argument here seems to be that it's in /proc, and that's dealt with if that helper script just thinks of /proc/device-tree as one possible place for the device tree path. In the future it could be under /sys. Indeed on sparc I think their device tree representation is a separate filesystem and could be anywhere. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson