Re: [PATCH] i2c-designware: add OF binding support
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-04 22:12:18
Also in:
linux-i2c
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On 08/04/2011 10:45 AM, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
Ben, On 08/04/2011 04:12 AM, Ben Dooks wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:04:23PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Add of_match_table and DT style i2c registration to designware i2c driver. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org> Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Cc: Ben Dooks <redacted> Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/dw-i2c.txt | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c | 13 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/dw-i2c.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/dw-i2c.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/dw-i2c.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cbcb404 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/dw-i2c.txt@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +* Synopsys DesignWare I2C + +Required properties : + + - compatible : should be "snps,designware-i2c" + - reg : Offset and length of the register set for the device + - interrupts : <IRQ> where IRQ is the interrupt number. + +Recommended properties : + + - clock-frequency : desired I2C bus clock frequency in Hz. + +Example : + + i2c@f0000 { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c"; + reg = <0xf0000 0x1000>; + interrupts = <11>; + clock-frequency = <400000>; + }; +looks good to me.quoted
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c index b7a51c4..2911a49 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@#include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/of_i2c.h> /* * Registers offset@@ -770,12 +771,17 @@ static int __devinit dw_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)adap->algo = &i2c_dw_algo; adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev; +#ifdef CONFIG_OF + r = i2c_add_adapter(adap); +#else adap->nr = pdev->id; r = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(adap); +#endifI would say that doing the #ifdef CONFIG_OF is dangerous here when we are in a mixed OF/platform enviromnent as we're depending on compile time selection. I'm also wondering whether we have an of helper macro which takes a pdev and gives you an adapter number either given on pdev->id or -1 for the case when we're using the OF bindings. It might be worth talking to Grant about setting pdev->id to -1 if we are using an OF device.As Grant said, that's already done and this hunk is not needed.quoted
quoted
if (r) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failure adding adapter\n"); goto err_free_irq; } + of_i2c_register_devices(adap);If we did that, we could add a of_i2c_register_adapter() call which would take the platform device and then do the of_i2c_register_devices() and do these steps.Better yet, how about putting of_i2c_register_devices into i2c_register_adapter? Everywhere that calls of_i2c_register_devices is preceded by a call to i2c_add_numbered_adapter or i2c_add_adapter. It seems logical to put it with i2c_scan_static_board_info. I'll prepare a patch to add that and remove all the other callers unless you think that's a bad idea.Nevermind. That would be undoing this commit: of/i2c: Fix module load order issue caused by of_i2c.c
The other alternative would be to move the i2c dt parsing code into drivers/i2c. I'm already planning to do that for spi and gpio dt parsing code. g.