Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mmc: sdhci: consolidate sdhci-of-esdhc and sdhci-esdhc-imx
From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-25 06:06:37
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mmc, linuxppc-dev
From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-25 06:06:37
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mmc, linuxppc-dev
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:40:54PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:22:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:quoted
This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It merges sdhci-of-esdhc.c into sdhci-esdhc.c, so that the same pair of .probe/.remove hook works with eSDHC for two platforms. As the results, sdhci-of-esdhc.c and sdhci-esdhc.h are removed, and header esdhc.h containing the definition of esdhc_platform_data is put into the public folder. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <redacted>I agree with Anton about not merging the two...quoted
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX +#define cpu_is_mx25() (0) +#define cpu_is_mx35() (0) +#define cpu_is_mx51() (0) +#define cpu_is_imx() (0) +#else +#define cpu_is_imx() (1) +#endif... e.g. that looks a bit frightening.
Agree. The use of cpu_is_mx..() in the driver itself seems a churn to me even without this consolidation patch. Is it possible for us to eliminate them by using pdata, and eventually device tree? When we are there, I might want to revisit the consolidation again. -- Regards, Shawn