Hi, Grant and Shawn,

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Grant Likely [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:32:01PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:

quoted

Hi Grant,

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:10:24AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Shawn Guo [off-list ref] wrote:

[...]

quoted

quoted

quoted

+       clocks {

Do we already have a clock binding specification, which is followed
by this example?  Or the properties given here still can be discussed
and open to change?

Also to support dynamically creating and registering 'struct clk' per
dt clock nodes, I need to add a few properties to map stuff like
parent 'struct clk', con_id of 'struct clk_lookup'.  Is there any
specification to follow, or I can draft it per the needs of my work?

The clock specifications are still in draft.  I'm not willing to lock
down on a binding until we've got some real implementations to back
them up.  If you need additional properties, go ahead an propose them.

Keep in mind when defining/extending bindings, that the dt is intended
to represent hardware layout, not Linux kernel internal implementation
details.  Try to avoid describing things in a linux-specific way.

I will consider all your review comments and come up with V2 patch soon.

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev