Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 6 authors, 2011-04-05

Re: [PATCH] uio/pdrv_genirq: Add OF support

From: Hans J. Koch <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-31 19:23:14
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 07:57:47PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Hans J. Koch wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:28:41PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+		uioinfo->name = pdev->dev.of_node->name;
+		/* Use version for storing full IP name for identification */
+		uioinfo->version = pdev->dev.of_node->full_name;
I don't think this is apropriate, but will leave that to Hans.
I was thinking what to add and I choose full_name because I can read
this value and identify which UIO is this device.
I know that there should be version but there is no version string in DTS.
The purpose of uio_info->version is to give the userspace part of the driver
additional information. Kernel part and userspace part might be developed
independently, and there should be a chance for the userspace part to find
out if a certain feature is already supported by the kernel part without
having to do dirty kernel version checks.

So, uio_info->version is an information about the driver, not the hardware.

Example: You write a UIO driver for a chip you use in a project. You don't
need all the functionality of that chip. One year later you need additional
chip functionality, and it turns out that you have to do certain
initializations in the kernel part. Your new userspace will need the new
kernel driver, but there are lots of older kernels around in your customers
devices. In that case, your userspace part can simply check the version
string in sysfs and require at least your new version.
I understand reasons but this information is not in device tree and
it must be setup.
Grant suggested compatible string but it is not the best option too.
In uio_pdrv_genirq, uio_info->version is hardcoded in platform data. Hardware
initialization can also take place in the same platform specific file, which
is common practice on archs like ARM. Therefore, a driver specific versioning
can make sense for UIO, even if the driver code itself doesn't change.

If you have no equivalent for that in device tree, you should create a new
generic driver (uio_of_genirq?) that simply doesn't support this kind of
versioning.

Seems like sometimes it's not enough to just describe hardware...

Thanks,
Hans
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help