Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets

From
Mark Brown <hidden>
Date
2011-03-18 15:15:14
Also in
lkml
Reply to
Arnd Bergmann, 2011-03-18
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:00:09PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 18 March 2011, Andy Green wrote:
quoted
What's the plan for leveraging that level of generality on "dynamically 
probed devices"?  I mean I know what I want to use this for and the 
platform_data scheme covers all the soldered-on-the-board cases fine.
Isn't there also a device tree based OMAP tree that can boot on
Panda and is just waiting to get merged?
Did the stuff with multiple interrupt controllers get resolved?  That's
pretty important for practical use.  There have been quite a few
iterations of the device tree patches for ARM over the last release but
the iterations I looked at all seemed to be bugfix type stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 7 authors, last reply 2011-03-18
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help