On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 08:59:29AM -0800, David Daney wrote:

On 02/22/2011 04:07 PM, David Gibson wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:57:46PM -0800, David Daney wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: David Daney<redacted>
---
 arch/mips/cavium-octeon/.gitignore      |    2 +
 arch/mips/cavium-octeon/Makefile        |   13 ++
 arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon_3xxx.dts |  314 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon_68xx.dts |   99 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 428 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/mips/cavium-octeon/.gitignore
 create mode 100644 arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon_3xxx.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon_68xx.dts

[...]

quoted

quoted

+    };
+  };

Uh.. where are the CPUs?

The number and type of CPUs can be (and is) probed.  There is an
existing mechanism for the bootloader to communicate which CPUs
should be used.

Hrm, ok.

Grant,

We've seen this now on both MIPS and ARM - dts files with no cpus, on
the grounds that those can be runtime probed.  I guess it makes sense,
although a dts without cpus looks very, very odd to me.  What are your
thoughts on this?

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson