On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:51:52PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:47:08 -0700
Grant Likely [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This addresses one of my comments on v2; but it doesn't address the
comment that the broken implementation of of_pdt_node_name for
non-sparc still remains, or am I missing something?

g.

I responded to that -
http://www.spinics.net/lists/sparclinux/msg08058.html

Weird; that reply didn't show up in my inbox (but my mailer did
receive it, so it is definitely a problem on my end).  I'll reply
now...

g.