Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2009-11-12

Aw: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mpc52xx/wdt: WDT uses GPT api

From: Albrecht Dre� <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-11 08:32:22
Also in: linuxppc-dev

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hi Grant:

O.k., thanks for your comments.  If Wim doesn't have any objections to it, I will provide a merged patch.  One consequence I forgot to mention is that we loose the ability to build the wdt support as module, but I don't think it's a real problem.

I think we still should keep the kernel config option enable/disable the wdt support, which would mask out the wdt code if disabled.  Is that ok for you?

Thanks, Albrecht.


----- Original Nachricht ----
Von:     Grant Likely [off-list ref]
An:      Albrecht Dreß [off-list ref]
Datum:   10.11.2009 22:07
Betreff: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mpc52xx/wdt: WDT uses GPT api
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Albrecht Dreß [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
Hi Grant:

Am 10.11.09 20:59 schrieb(en) Grant Likely:
quoted
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Albrecht Dreß
[off-list ref]
quoted
quoted
wrote:
quoted
Use the MPC5200 GPT api for the WDT which drastically simplifies this
file.

Signed-off-by: Albrecht Dreß <redacted>
---

 drivers/watchdog/mpc5200_wdt.c |  246
+++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 181 deletions(-)

Can the WDT functionality just be merged entirely into
arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_gpt.c, eliminating the need for
this file entirely?  I think I'd rather have all the GPT "built in"
behaviour handled by a single driver.
I also thought about it, as it has IMHO the cleaner code, and it would
have
quoted
the extra benefit that the gpt-wdt api doesn't need to be public.

However, the reasons I hesitated to do so are:
- I don't want to remove a file someone else wrote (even it doesn't
work);

Shouldn't be a problem, and I'll handle the fallout if it is.
quoted
- WDT code is shifted from drivers/watchdog to
arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx
quoted
which might not be the "logical" place from the directory layout's pov;
There is precedence of this in the past, particularly on arch or
platform specific hardware drivers and multifunction devices.  (Heck,
that's almost entirely what arch/powerpc/sysdev is).  I'm not
concerned.
quoted
- a file living in arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx depends upon config
options
quoted
set from drivers/watchdog/Kconfig which may be confusing.
I'm not concerned about this either.
quoted
You see these are more political/cosmetical questions, so I would prefer
to
quoted
leave the decision to the maintainers (i.e. you and Wim).  Preparing a
fully
quoted
merged driver is actually a matter of minutes!
Do it.  I'll champion getting it in.  Wim, do you have any issues with
this?

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Jetzt NEU: Do it youself E-Cards bei Arcor.de!
Stellen Sie Ihr eigenes Unikat zusammen und machen Sie dem Empfänger eine ganz persönliche Freude!
E-Card Marke Eigenbau: HIER KLICKEN: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.ecard
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help