On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:39 -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:

I guess we would need to decide how those documents are published
without using proprietary software, then, and easily committed to
another git repository (or the same one just in a published form).
I don't suppose office xml is a good choice? It should be flexible
enough and similar enough that sections and layout do not change a
great deal, and git can easily produce diffs?

I would suggest using DocBook if publishing PDFs is a goal.  It would
also let you output text and HTML as an added bonus.

-- 
Nate Case [off-list ref]