Re: [PATCH 0/3]: Sparc OF I2C support.
From: Jon Smirl <hidden>
Date: 2008-08-21 23:45:23
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, sparclinux
From: Jon Smirl <hidden>
Date: 2008-08-21 23:45:23
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, sparclinux
On 8/21/08, Grant Likely [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Scott Wood [off-list ref] wrote: > David Miller wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:10:12AM -0700, David Miller wrote:quoted
quoted
If you guys created this format in your compressed openfirmware>> trees, is it possible for you to "fix" it to match what Sparc >> systems following the proper bindings do? > > Possibly, though it'll cause some pain when old trees are used with a kernel > that expects the new binding. Ugh, more like loads of pain. There are deployed platforms using the embedded 'invented' bindings. I don't think it is an option to break compatibility with older trees. If there is some backwards compatibility code then I'm all for migrating to the same binding as Sparc and PowerMac
Has anything really been deployed? These bindings are only a few months old. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com