Re: [PATCH 08/18] crypto: testmgr - run only subset of DH vectors based on config
From: Nicolai Stange <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-09 09:18:33
Also in:
keyrings, lkml
Hannes Reinecke [off-list ref] writes:
On 12/1/21 1:48 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:quoted
With the previous patches, the testmgr now has up to four test vectors for DH which all test more or less the same thing: - the two vectors from before this series, - the vector for the ffdhe2048 group, enabled if CONFIG_CRYPTO_DH_GROUPS_RFC7919 is set and - the vector for the modp2048 group, similarly enabled if CONFIG_CRYPTO_DH_GROUPS_RFC3526 is set. In order to avoid too much redundancy during DH testing, enable only a subset of these depending on the kernel config: - if CONFIG_CRYPTO_DH_GROUPS_RFC7919 is set, enable only the ffdhe2048 vector, - otherwise, if CONFIG_CRYPTO_DH_GROUPS_RFC3526 is set, enable only the modp2048 vector and - only enable the original two vectors if neither of these options has been selected. Note that an upcoming patch will make the DH implementation to reject any domain parameters not corresponding to some safe-prime group approved by SP800-56Arev3 in FIPS mode. Thus, having CONFIG_FIPS enabled, but both of CONFIG_CRYPTO_DH_GROUPS_RFC7919 and CONFIG_CRYPTO_DH_GROUPS_RFC3526 unset wouldn't make much sense as it would render the DH implementation unusable in FIPS mode. Conversely, any reasonable configuration would ensure that the original, non-conforming test vectors would not get to run in FIPS mode.For some weird reason the NVMe spec mandates for its TLS profile the ffdhe3072 group, so I would prefer if you would be using that as the default group for testing.
Done for v2.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <redacted> --- crypto/testmgr.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/crypto/testmgr.h b/crypto/testmgr.h index d18844c7499e..b295512c8f22 100644 --- a/crypto/testmgr.h +++ b/crypto/testmgr.h@@ -1331,8 +1331,7 @@ static const struct kpp_testvec dh_tv_template[] = { .expected_a_public_size = 256, .expected_ss_size = 256, }, -#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DH_GROUPS_RFC7919) */ -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DH_GROUPS_RFC3526) +#elif IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DH_GROUPS_RFC3526) { .secret = #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN@@ -1423,7 +1422,7 @@ static const struct kpp_testvec dh_tv_template[] = { .expected_a_public_size = 256, .expected_ss_size = 256, }, -#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DH_GROUPS_RFC3526) */ +#else { .secret = #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN@@ -1642,6 +1641,7 @@ static const struct kpp_testvec dh_tv_template[] = { .expected_a_public_size = 256, .expected_ss_size = 256, }, +#endif }; static const struct kpp_testvec curve25519_tv_template[] = {... and maybe add a config option to run a full test.
I didn't do this at this point, because I don't see much value in running tests on more than one randomly selected DH group, i.e. on ffdhe3072 and modp2048: both test vectors test the same code paths. It might perhaps make sense to run tests for all the DH safe-prime groups each for verifying that the resp. ->p primes are all correct. But that would be a large TV dump and I'm not sure it would be desirable... Thanks, Nicolai -- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg), GF: Ivo Totev