Re: [PATCH 10/12] nvmet: Implement basic In-Band Authentication
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date: 2021-11-22 13:21:20
Also in:
linux-nvme
On 11/22/21 12:59 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
quoted
+void nvmet_execute_auth_send(struct nvmet_req *req) +{ + struct nvmet_ctrl *ctrl = req->sq->ctrl; + struct nvmf_auth_dhchap_success2_data *data; + void *d; + u32 tl; + u16 status = 0; + + if (req->cmd->auth_send.secp != NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_PROTOCOL_IDENTIFIER) { + status = NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_SC_DNR; + req->error_loc = + offsetof(struct nvmf_auth_send_command, secp); + goto done; + } + if (req->cmd->auth_send.spsp0 != 0x01) { + status = NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_SC_DNR; + req->error_loc = + offsetof(struct nvmf_auth_send_command, spsp0); + goto done; + } + if (req->cmd->auth_send.spsp1 != 0x01) { + status = NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_SC_DNR; + req->error_loc = + offsetof(struct nvmf_auth_send_command, spsp1); + goto done; + } + tl = le32_to_cpu(req->cmd->auth_send.tl); + if (!tl) { + status = NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_SC_DNR; + req->error_loc = + offsetof(struct nvmf_auth_send_command, tl); + goto done; + } + if (!nvmet_check_transfer_len(req, tl)) { + pr_debug("%s: transfer length mismatch (%u)\n", __func__, tl); + return; + } + + d = kmalloc(tl, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!d) { + status = NVME_SC_INTERNAL; + goto done; + } + + status = nvmet_copy_from_sgl(req, 0, d, tl); + if (status) { + kfree(d); + goto done; + } + + data = d; + pr_debug("%s: ctrl %d qid %d type %d id %d step %x\n", __func__, + ctrl->cntlid, req->sq->qid, data->auth_type, data->auth_id, + req->sq->dhchap_step); + if (data->auth_type != NVME_AUTH_COMMON_MESSAGES && + data->auth_type != NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGES) + goto done_failure1; + if (data->auth_type == NVME_AUTH_COMMON_MESSAGES) { + if (data->auth_id == NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGE_NEGOTIATE) { + /* Restart negotiation */ + pr_debug("%s: ctrl %d qid %d reset negotiation\n", __func__, + ctrl->cntlid, req->sq->qid); + if (!req->sq->qid) { + status = nvmet_setup_auth(ctrl);Aren't you leaking memory here?
I've checked, and I _think_ everything is in order. Any particular concerns? ( 'd' is free at 'done_kfree', and we never exit without going through it AFAICS). Have I missed something? Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)