Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm: use SM3 instead of SM3_256
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-10-12 15:22:03
Also in:
keyrings, linux-doc, linux-integrity, linux-security-module, lkml
On Sat, 2021-10-09 at 21:08 +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html, SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3. Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <redacted>
This is not enough to make any changes because the commit message does not describe what goes wrong if we keep it as it was. /Jarkko