Re: [bug report] crypto: aesni - xts_crypt() return if walk.nbytes is 0
From: Shreyansh Chouhan <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-12 05:02:47
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 06:23:04PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 09:32, Dan Carpenter [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:27:46PM +0530, Shreyansh Chouhan wrote:quoted
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:24:37PM +0530, Shreyansh Chouhan wrote:quoted
Hi Dan, Sorry for the delay in the response. On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:54:40PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:quoted
Hello Shreyansh Chouhan, The patch 72ff2bf04db2: "crypto: aesni - xts_crypt() return if walk.nbytes is 0" from Aug 22, 2021, leads to the following Smatch static checker warning: arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c:915 xts_crypt() warn: possible missing kernel_fpu_end() arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c 839 static int xts_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, bool encrypt) 840 { 841 struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req); 842 struct aesni_xts_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm); 843 int tail = req->cryptlen % AES_BLOCK_SIZE; 844 struct skcipher_request subreq; 845 struct skcipher_walk walk; 846 int err; 847 848 if (req->cryptlen < AES_BLOCK_SIZE) 849 return -EINVAL; 850 851 err = skcipher_walk_virt(&walk, req, false); 852 if (!walk.nbytes) 853 return err; The patch adds this check for "walk.nbytes == 0". 854 855 if (unlikely(tail > 0 && walk.nbytes < walk.total)) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ But Smatch says that "walk.nbytes" can be set to zero inside this if statement.Indeed that is so, I missed it the first time around.quoted
856 int blocks = DIV_ROUND_UP(req->cryptlen, AES_BLOCK_SIZE) - 2; 857 858 skcipher_walk_abort(&walk); 859 860 skcipher_request_set_tfm(&subreq, tfm); 861 skcipher_request_set_callback(&subreq, 862 skcipher_request_flags(req), 863 NULL, NULL); 864 skcipher_request_set_crypt(&subreq, req->src, req->dst, 865 blocks * AES_BLOCK_SIZE, req->iv); 866 req = &subreq; 867 868 err = skcipher_walk_virt(&walk, req, false); 869 if (err) 870 return err;We can replace the above if (err) check with another if (!walk.nbytes) check.quoted
871 } else { 872 tail = 0; 873 } 874 875 kernel_fpu_begin(); 876 877 /* calculate first value of T */ 878 aesni_enc(aes_ctx(ctx->raw_tweak_ctx), walk.iv, walk.iv); 879 Leading to not entering this loop and so we don't restore kernel_fpu_end(). So maybe the "if (walk.nbytes == 0)" check should be moved to right before the call to kernel_fpu_begin()?Instead of moving the first walk.nbytes check, I think we can have two if (!walk.nbytes) checks. There was a discussion between Herbert Xu and Ard Biesheuvel, and Herbert wrote in his email that most skcipher walkers are not supposed to explicitly check on the err value, and should instead terminate the loop whenever walk.nbytes is set to 0. Here is a link to that discussion: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20210820125315.GB28484@gondor.apana.org.au/ (local)I can send in a patch that replaces the if (err) check with an if (!walk.nbytes) check if that is fine with you.Yes, please!Ehm, how would that patch be any different from the one that you sent 2+ weeks ago and which was already merged by Herbert and pulled by Linus? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=72ff2bf04db2a48840df93a461b7115900f46c05
The previous patch that I sent adds a walk.nbytes after the skcipher_walk_virt() call at line 851[1] in the code. There is another call to skcipher_walk_virt() before we call kernel_fpu_begin(), at line 868[2], this patch adds a walk.nbytes check after that function call. Regards, Shreyansh Chouhan -- [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c#n851 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c#n868