From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Certain SoC are missing the middle part gpios in consecutive pins, it's better to check if mtk_pin_desc is a valid pin for the extensibility
Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <redacted>
---
v2: applied the comment suggested by reviewers:
- for the pins not ballout, we can fill .name in struct mtk_pin_desc
as NULL and return -ENOTSUPP in gpio/pinconf ops.
Thanks for take the suggestion and the improvement.
Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
quoted hunk
---
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
index 3a4a23c40a71..ad3b67163973 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ static int mtk_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
int pin = grp->pins[i];
desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin];
+ if (!desc->name)
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MODE,
pin_modes[i]);
@@ -76,6 +78,8 @@ static int mtk_pinmux_gpio_request_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin];
+ if (!desc->name)
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
<snip>