On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 09:35 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:

On 2/1/21 8:23 AM, David Howells wrote:

quoted

Stefan Berger [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>

Detect whether a key is an sm2 type of key by its OID in the parameters
array rather than assuming that everything under OID_id_ecPublicKey
is sm2, which is not the case.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org

I presume these cc's are intentionally not on the first patch or the cover (if
there is one)?

No, this is not intentional. I guess this is a case of wrong use of cc: 
versus mailing lists - my bad. I posted the whole series to 
linux-crypto, linux-integrity, keyrings and lkml.

V6 is at least visible here now:

- https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/31/323

- https://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=161213604618722&w=2

- 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210131233301.1301787-1-stefanb@linux.ibm.com/T/#mbc9fae5facb4178f64c1145e2654258c0af8fa96 (local)

- https://marc.info/?l=linux-keyrings&m=161213608818735&w=2

quoted

Do you have a branch you want me to pull or did you want me to take just
patches 2-4?

Please take it from the mailing list. If there are requests for more 
changes on the crypto level, I will send another series. I personally am 
waiting for some sort of verdict on the crypto level...

The entire patch set should be upstreamed as a single patch set, after
having each of the maintainer's Ack it.  In addition, the v6 version is
missing some Reviewed-by tags.  (Stefan will re-post a v7 patch set.)

David, I don't have problem with this patch set being upstreamed via
the keys subsystem, assuming it's been tested.

thanks,

Mimi