[PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for x509 certs with NIST p256 and p192 keys · Stefan Berger <hidden> · 2021-01-28
[PATCH v4 2/3] x509: Detect sm2 keys by their parameters OID · Stefan Berger <hidden> · 2021-01-28
[PATCH v4 3/3] x509: Add support for parsing x509 certs with ECDSA keys · Stefan Berger <hidden> · 2021-01-28
[PATCH v4 1/3] crypto: Add support for ECDSA signature verification · Stefan Berger <hidden> · 2021-01-28
Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] crypto: Add support for ECDSA signature verification · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> · 2021-01-29
Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for x509 certs with NIST p256 and p192 keys · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2021-01-28
Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for x509 certs with NIST p256 and p192 keys · Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-01-28
Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for x509 certs with NIST p256 and p192 keys · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2021-01-28
Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for x509 certs with NIST p256 and p192 keys · Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-01-28

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for x509 certs with NIST p256 and p192 keys

From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-01-28 13:59:11
Also in: keyrings, lkml

On 1/28/21 8:54 AM, David Howells wrote:

Stefan Berger [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

This (sub)set is intended to go through the keyrings tree or is it all going
through the crypto tree now?

Patch 1/3 should go through 'crypto', the other ones through 'keyrings'.

Do 2 & 3 depend on 1?


Functionality-wise, yes, compilation-wise, no.

   Stefan