Hi Nemoto-san,

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:18 AM Atsushi Nemoto [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:41:24 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

Is that sufficient to keep it?

for me it is. But now we probaly need some reverts then...

Indeed. Fortunately not all of it, as some removals were TX4938-only.

These patches should not break RBTX4927:

  net: tc35815: Drop support for TX49XX boards
  spi: txx9: Remove driver
  mtd: Remove drivers used by TX49xx
  char: hw_random: Remove tx4939 driver
  rtc: tx4939: Remove driver
  ide: tx4938ide: Remove driver

Indeed.

And these patches just break audio-support only.

  dma: tx49 removal
  ASoC: txx9: Remove driver

I think dma and ASoC drivers are hard to maintain now, and can be
dropped for basic support for RBTX4927.
(TX39 boards does not have audio-support, so dma txx9 driver can be
dropped too)

Agreed, I don't test audio anyway, but I know it used to work (I had
intended to use the board as an MPD media server, but never got beyond
the prototyping phase).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds