Re: [PATCH v4] crypto: xts - Drop use of auxiliary buffer
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-09-10 16:17:14
Also in:
dm-devel
Hi Ondrej, On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 01:28:41PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
-static int init_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, crypto_completion_t done)
+static int xor_tweak_pre(struct skcipher_request *req)
{
- struct priv *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req));
- struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
- struct skcipher_request *subreq;
- gfp_t gfp;
-
- subreq = &rctx->subreq;
- skcipher_request_set_tfm(subreq, ctx->child);
- skcipher_request_set_callback(subreq, req->base.flags, done, req);
-
- gfp = req->base.flags & CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP ? GFP_KERNEL :
- GFP_ATOMIC;
- rctx->ext = NULL;
-
- subreq->cryptlen = XTS_BUFFER_SIZE;
- if (req->cryptlen > XTS_BUFFER_SIZE) {
- unsigned int n = min(req->cryptlen, (unsigned int)PAGE_SIZE);
-
- rctx->ext = kmalloc(n, gfp);
- if (rctx->ext)
- subreq->cryptlen = n;
- }
-
- rctx->src = req->src;
- rctx->dst = req->dst;
- rctx->left = req->cryptlen;
-
- /* calculate first value of T */
- crypto_cipher_encrypt_one(ctx->tweak, (u8 *)&rctx->t, req->iv);
-
- return 0;
+ return xor_tweak(req, false);
}
-static void exit_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req)
+static int xor_tweak_post(struct skcipher_request *req)
{
- struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
-
- rctx->left = 0;
-
- if (rctx->ext)
- kzfree(rctx->ext);
+ return xor_tweak(req, false);
}I think you meant 'xor_tweak(req, true);' here?
+static void crypt_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err)
{
struct skcipher_request *req = areq->data;
- struct skcipher_request *subreq;
- struct rctx *rctx;
-
- rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
-
- if (err == -EINPROGRESS) {
- if (rctx->left != req->cryptlen)
- return;
- goto out;
- }
-
- subreq = &rctx->subreq;
- subreq->base.flags &= CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG;
- err = do_encrypt(req, err ?: post_crypt(req));
- if (rctx->left)
- return;
+ if (!err)
+ err = xor_tweak(req, true);
Use xor_tweak_post()?
Note that you could also change the bool to
enum {
FIRST_PASS,
SECOND_PASS,
}
if you find the bool to be unclear.
Thanks,
- Eric