Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2018-07-02

Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] dm integrity: Remove VLA usage

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2018-06-29 20:43:40
Also in: dm-devel, lkml

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:28 AM, Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
index 86438b2f10dd..85e8ce1625a2 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
@@ -521,7 +521,12 @@ static void section_mac(struct dm_integrity_c *ic, unsigned section, __u8 result
                }
                memset(result + size, 0, JOURNAL_MAC_SIZE - size);
        } else {
-               __u8 digest[size];
+               __u8 digest[SHASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE];
+
+               if (WARN_ON(size > sizeof(digest))) {
+                       dm_integrity_io_error(ic, "digest_size", -EINVAL);
+                       goto err;
+               }
I'm still slightly worried that some patches like this one could make
things worse
and lead to an actual stack overflow. You define SHASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE
as '512', which is still quite a lot to put on the kernel stack. The
function also
uses SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(), so now you have two copies. Then you
could call shash_final_unaligned(), which seems to put a third copy on
the stack,
so replacing each one with a fixed-size buffer adds quite a bit of bloat.

Is there actually a digest that can be used in dm-integrity with more than 64
byte output (matching JOURNAL_MAC_SIZE) here?

       Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help