Re: [PATCH] crypto/ecc: Remove stack VLA usage
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-08 21:55:22
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:43 AM, Tudor Ambarus [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi, Kees, On 03/07/2018 11:56 PM, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
On the quest to remove all VLAs from the kernel[1], this switches to a pair of kmalloc regions instead of using the stack. This also moves the get_random_bytes() after all allocations (and drops the needless "nbytes" variable). [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621 Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted> --- crypto/ecc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/crypto/ecc.c b/crypto/ecc.c index 18f32f2a5e1c..5bfa63603da0 100644 --- a/crypto/ecc.c +++ b/crypto/ecc.c@@ -1025,9 +1025,7 @@ int crypto_ecdh_shared_secret(unsigned int curve_id,unsigned int ndigits, { int ret = 0; struct ecc_point *product, *pk; - u64 priv[ndigits]; - u64 rand_z[ndigits]; - unsigned int nbytes; + u64 *priv, *rand_z; const struct ecc_curve *curve = ecc_get_curve(curve_id); if (!private_key || !public_key || !curve) {@@ -1035,14 +1033,22 @@ int crypto_ecdh_shared_secret(unsigned intcurve_id, unsigned int ndigits, goto out; } - nbytes = ndigits << ECC_DIGITS_TO_BYTES_SHIFT; + priv = kmalloc_array(ndigits, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!priv) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out; + } - get_random_bytes(rand_z, nbytes); + rand_z = kmalloc_array(ndigits, sizeof(*rand_z), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!rand_z) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto kfree_out; + } pk = ecc_alloc_point(ndigits); if (!pk) { ret = -ENOMEM; - goto out; + goto kfree_out; } product = ecc_alloc_point(ndigits);@@ -1051,6 +1057,8 @@ int crypto_ecdh_shared_secret(unsigned int curve_id,unsigned int ndigits, goto err_alloc_product; } + get_random_bytes(rand_z, ndigits << ECC_DIGITS_TO_BYTES_SHIFT); + ecc_swap_digits(public_key, pk->x, ndigits); ecc_swap_digits(&public_key[ndigits], pk->y, ndigits); ecc_swap_digits(private_key, priv, ndigits);@@ -1065,6 +1073,9 @@ int crypto_ecdh_shared_secret(unsigned int curve_id,unsigned int ndigits, ecc_free_point(product); err_alloc_product: ecc_free_point(pk); +kfree_out: + kfree(priv);I think we should use kzfree here.quoted
+ kfree(rand_z);Probably here too.
Ah yeah, good idea. I'll send a v2.
Looks like there are few intermediate buffers in ecc that should be zeroized as well.
Can you send a patch for those? Thanks! -Kees
Best, taquoted
out: return ret; }
-- Kees Cook Pixel Security