Re: Kernel panic - encryption/decryption failed when open file on Arm64
From: xiakaixu <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-09 04:09:43
Also in:
lkml
Sorry for resend this email, just add the linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
and linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org.
Hi,
Firstly, thanks for your reply!
To reproduce this kernel panic, I test the encryption/decryption feature
on arm64 board with more memory. Just add the following
change:
diff --git a/crypto/blkcipher.c b/crypto/blkcipher.c
index 0122bec..10ef3f4 100644
--- a/crypto/blkcipher.c
+++ b/crypto/blkcipher.c
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ static int blkcipher_walk_next(struct
blkcipher_desc *desc,
walk->flags |= BLKCIPHER_WALK_COPY;
if (!walk->page) {
walk->page = (void
*)__get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
+ walk->page = NULL;
if (!walk->page)
n = 0;
}
This change just set the walk->page to NULL manually.
I get the same crash when open file with the above change log. So I
think this NULL page failure is not be handled correctly in current code.
Regards
Kaixu Xia
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 08:38:43PM +0800, xiakaixu wrote:quoted
Hi, I am using the encryption/decryption feature on arm64 board and a kernel panic occurs just when open a file. As the memory size of the board is limited and there are some page allocation failures before the panic. Seems it is a kernel bug from the call trace log. ... - fscrypt_get_encryption_info - get_crypt_info.part.1 - validate_user_key.isra.0 - derive_aes_gcm_key - crypto_gcm_decrypt - ablk_decrypt - ctr_encrypt - blkcipher_walk_done - blkcipher_walk_next - __get_free_pages ----------------------------------> page allocation failure ... - aes_ctr_encrypt -----------------------------------------> the input parameter is NULL pointer as the page allocation failure The input parameter of function aes_ctr_encrypt() comes from the /struct blkcipher_walk// //walk/, and this variable /walk /is allocated by the function __get_free_pages(). So if this page allocate failed, the input parameter of function aes_ctr_encrypt() will be NULL. The panic will occurs if we don't check the input parameter. Not sure about this and wish to get your opinions!If the page allocation fails in blkcipher_walk_next it'll simply switch over to processing it block by block. so I don't think the warning is related to the crash. Cheers,