__ARM_FEATURE_UNALIGNED (cf.,
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0774f/chr1383660321827.html)
. MIPSEL does not define such a macro.

    # MIPS ci20 creator with GCC 4.6
    $ gcc -march=native -dM -E - </dev/null | grep -i align
    #define __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ 8

If the MIPS CPU does not tolerate unaligned data access, then the
following could SIGBUS:

quoted

+       u32 *data = buf;
+       *data = jz4780_rng_readl(jz4780_rng, REG_RNG_DATA);

If GCC emits code that uses the MIPS unaligned load and store
instructions, then there's probably going to be a performance penalty.

Regardless of what the CPU tolerates, I believe unaligned data access
is undefined behavior in C/C++. I believe you should memcpy the value
into the buffer.

I am not sure whether this is required. 'buf' is part of a structure
so I guess it is properly aligned by padding. Not sure though, will
look about this.