Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 5 authors, 2016-01-11

Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: algif_skcipher - Require setkey before accept(2)

From: Milan Broz <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-02 20:18:37
Also in: lkml

On 01/02/2016 09:03 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2016, 15:41:34 schrieb Milan Broz:

Hi Milan,
...
quoted
quoted
Hi Herbert,

this patch breaks userspace in cryptsetup...

We use algif_skcipher in cryptsetup (for years, even before
there was Stephan's library) and with this patch applied
I see fail in ALG_SET_IV call (patch from your git).
(Obviously this was because of failing accept() call here, not set_iv.)
quoted
I can fix it upstream, but for thousands of installations it will
be broken (for LUKS there is a fallback, cor TrueCrypt compatible devices
it will be unusable. Also people who configured kernel crypto API as
default backend will have non-working cryptsetup).

Is it really thing for stable branch?
Also how it is supposed to work for cipher_null, where there is no key?
Why it should call set_key if it is noop? (and set key length 0 is not
possible).

(We are using cipher_null for testing and for offline re-encryption tool
to create temporary "fake" header for not-yet encrypted device...)
The change implies that any setkey or set IV operations (i.e. any operations 
on the tfmfd) are done before the opfd(s) are created with one or more accept 
calls.

Thus, after a bind that returns the tfmfd, the setkey and setiv operations 
shall be called. This is followed by accept. If you change the order of 
invocations in your code, it should work.
Hi,

I already changed it in cryptsetup upstream this way.

But I cannot change thousands of cryptsetup installations that are actively using that code.
This is clear userspace breakage which should not happen this way.

(Moreover it still doesn't work for cipher_null that has min/max key size 0.)

Milan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help