On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Lee Jones wrote:

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Herbert Xu wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:53:50PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On 18 September 2015 at 15:07, Herbert Xu [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:45:50PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

v1 => v2:
 - New patch: Also fixing /dev/hw_random => /dev/hwrng in Kconfig
 - Fix 2099 => 2009 typo in commit log
 - Fix 'number of random numbers sourced' return value
 - Treat devm_clk_get()'s return value correctly
 - Check return value of clk_prepare_enable()
 - Use sysfs_streq() instead of manually stripping '\n' from sysfs

All applied.  Thanks.

Just to be clear.  Which patches have you applied?

All of your patches.

I think it's okay for you to take all but patch 6.

Patch 6 is an ARM patch and needs to go into ARM SoC via
STMicroelectronics STi tree.

Hi Herbert,

I see that your tree is 8 days old, so this may have been resolved
already, but would you be kind enough to ensure you remove the 6th
(ARM) patch from your repo please?  I wouldn't want it to cause
conflicts and for Maxime and yourself to get shouted at by Linus.

Much appreciated.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog