From: Bruce Allan <redacted>
The subject macro mistakenly compares the passed-in ring size in bytes
with ADF_RING_SIZE_4K which is 0x6 (an internal representation of 4KB)
rather than comparing with the intended value of 4096.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <redacted>
---
.../qat/qat_common/adf_transport_access_macros.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_transport_access_macros.h b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_transport_access_macros.h
index 160c9a3..6ad7e4e 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_transport_access_macros.h
+++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/adf_transport_access_macros.h
@@ -97,8 +97,9 @@
#define ADF_RING_SIZE_IN_BYTES_TO_SIZE(SIZE) ((1 << (SIZE - 1)) >> 7)
/* Minimum ring bufer size for memory allocation */
-#define ADF_RING_SIZE_BYTES_MIN(SIZE) ((SIZE < ADF_RING_SIZE_4K) ? \
- ADF_RING_SIZE_4K : SIZE)
+#define ADF_RING_SIZE_BYTES_MIN(SIZE) \
+ ((SIZE < ADF_SIZE_TO_RING_SIZE_IN_BYTES(ADF_RING_SIZE_4K)) ? \
+ ADF_SIZE_TO_RING_SIZE_IN_BYTES(ADF_RING_SIZE_4K) : SIZE)
#define ADF_RING_SIZE_MODULO(SIZE) (SIZE + 0x6)
#define ADF_SIZE_TO_POW(SIZE) ((((SIZE & 0x4) >> 1) | ((SIZE & 0x4) >> 2) | \
SIZE) & ~0x4)