Re: [net-next PATCH RFC 0/3] Preserve skb->mark through VTI tunnels

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:41:10PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:

These patches are meant to try and address the fact the VTI tunnels are
currently overwriting the skb->mark value.  I am generally happy with the
first two patches, however the third patch still modifies the skb->mark,
though it undoes after the fact.

The main problem I am trying to address is the fact that currently if I use
an v6 over v6 VTI tunnel I cannot receive any traffic on the interface as
the skb->mark is bleeding through and causing the traffic to be dropped.

Looks good to me.  Thanks for following up on this!
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt