Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 6 authors, 2014-08-03

Re: [PATCH -v4] random: introduce getrandom(2) system call

From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-30 22:18:23
Also in: linux-api, lkml

On Wed 2014-07-30 16:40:52, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mit, 2014-07-30 at 07:56 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
quoted
Pavel. I have bit 'ol enterprise daemon running with established file
descriptors serving thousands of connections
which periodically require entropy.  Now I run out of descriptors. I
can't establish new connections. but I should
now halt all the other ones that require entropy?  I should raise
SIGKILL on my process serving these thousands
of connetions?  I don't think so.
If that long-running daemon periodically needs something from a device,
one would better keep the fd for that open the whole time. Saves some
CPU cycles and latency too BTW.
Agreed.

On the other hand, keeping a fd open is quite tricky for a
library. But better solution might be to make that easier.

open( , O_IM_A_LIBRARY_GIVE_ME_ONE_OF_THREE_RESERVED_FDS) might be one
solution. Actually, one reserved fd should be enough.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help