Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2012-11-16

Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] ARM: OMAP2xxx: hwmod: Convert SHAM crypto device data to hwmod

flat view

From: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com>
Date: 2012-11-09 17:07:05
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap

On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:10:20PM +0200, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your comments, Dmitry.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Mark A. Greer [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@animalcreek.com>

Convert the device data for the OMAP2 SHAM crypto IP from
explicit platform_data to hwmod.

CC: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com>
---
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
index cba60e0..f18fa50 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
quoted
@@ -501,16 +485,24 @@ static struct platform_device sham_device = {
 static void omap_init_sham(void)
 {
        if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
-               sham_device.resource = omap2_sham_resources;
-               sham_device.num_resources = omap2_sham_resources_sz;
+               struct omap_hwmod *oh;
+               struct platform_device *pdev;
+
+               oh = omap_hwmod_lookup("sham");
+               if (!oh)
+                       return;
+
+               pdev = omap_device_build("omap-sham", -1, oh, NULL, 0, NULL,
+                                        0, 0);
+               WARN(IS_ERR(pdev), "Can't build omap_device for omap-sham\n");
        } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
                sham_device.resource = omap3_sham_resources;
                sham_device.num_resources = omap3_sham_resources_sz;
+               platform_device_register(&sham_device);
Why changes are only for OMAP2?
OMAP3 is also the same class.
This patch is specifically for omap2.
A following patch does the same for omap3.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_2xxx_interconnect_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_2xxx_interconnect_data.c
index 1a1287d..bb314c5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_2xxx_interconnect_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_2xxx_interconnect_data.c
@@ -138,6 +138,15 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_addr_space omap2_rng_addr_space[] = {
        { }
 };

+struct omap_hwmod_addr_space omap2xxx_sham_addrs[] = {
+       {
+               .pa_start       = 0x480a4000,
+               .pa_end         = 0x480a4000 + 0x64 - 1,
+               .flags          = ADDR_TYPE_RT
+       },
+       { }
+};
Why not using macros as it was before?

OMAP24XX_SEC_SHA1MD5_BASE
I am following the precedent set in the existing code of that file
which uses the actual address instead of a macro (except for uart).

I have no preference but I believe that is how Paul prefers it.

Paul?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help