Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] ARM: OMAP2xxx: hwmod: Convert SHAM crypto device data to hwmod
flat view
From: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com>
Date: 2012-11-09 17:07:05
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:10:20PM +0200, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your comments, Dmitry.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Mark A. Greer [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@animalcreek.com> Convert the device data for the OMAP2 SHAM crypto IP from explicit platform_data to hwmod. CC: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com> ---
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c index cba60e0..f18fa50 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
quoted
@@ -501,16 +485,24 @@ static struct platform_device sham_device = { static void omap_init_sham(void) { if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) { - sham_device.resource = omap2_sham_resources; - sham_device.num_resources = omap2_sham_resources_sz; + struct omap_hwmod *oh; + struct platform_device *pdev; + + oh = omap_hwmod_lookup("sham"); + if (!oh) + return; + + pdev = omap_device_build("omap-sham", -1, oh, NULL, 0, NULL, + 0, 0); + WARN(IS_ERR(pdev), "Can't build omap_device for omap-sham\n"); } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) { sham_device.resource = omap3_sham_resources; sham_device.num_resources = omap3_sham_resources_sz; + platform_device_register(&sham_device);Why changes are only for OMAP2? OMAP3 is also the same class.
This patch is specifically for omap2. A following patch does the same for omap3.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_2xxx_interconnect_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_2xxx_interconnect_data.c index 1a1287d..bb314c5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_2xxx_interconnect_data.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_2xxx_interconnect_data.c@@ -138,6 +138,15 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_addr_space omap2_rng_addr_space[] = { { } }; +struct omap_hwmod_addr_space omap2xxx_sham_addrs[] = { + { + .pa_start = 0x480a4000, + .pa_end = 0x480a4000 + 0x64 - 1, + .flags = ADDR_TYPE_RT + }, + { } +};Why not using macros as it was before? OMAP24XX_SEC_SHA1MD5_BASE
I am following the precedent set in the existing code of that file which uses the actual address instead of a macro (except for uart). I have no preference but I believe that is how Paul prefers it. Paul?