[GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-25
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-25
Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-25
Re: Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers · Alan Cox <hidden> · 2012-09-25
Re: Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-25
Re: Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers · Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> · 2012-09-25
Re: Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers · Alan Cox <hidden> · 2012-09-25
Re: Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-25
Re: Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers · Tomas Mraz <hidden> · 2012-09-25
Re: Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-25
Re: Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers · Tomas Mraz <hidden> · 2012-09-25
Re: Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers · David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> · 2013-03-14
[PATCH] Fix x509_key_preparse() not to reject keys outside their validity time range · David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> · 2013-03-14
Re: [PATCH] Fix x509_key_preparse() not to reject keys outside their validity time range · Alexander Holler <hidden> · 2013-03-19
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Kasatkin, Dmitry <hidden> · 2012-09-25
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-25
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-09-26
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-26
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-09-27
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-27
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-09-28
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-28
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-09-29
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-29
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Josh Boyer <hidden> · 2012-10-01
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-10-02
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Josh Boyer <hidden> · 2012-10-02
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-29
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-10-02
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-10-02
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-10-04
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Kasatkin, Dmitry <hidden> · 2012-10-09
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-10-10
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-28
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-28
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-09-28
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-28
[PATCH 2/2] modules: don't call eu-strip if it doesn't exist. · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-09-28
Re: [PATCH 2/2] modules: don't call eu-strip if it doesn't exist. · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-28
[PATCH 1/2] modsign: don't use bashism in sh scripts. · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-09-28
Re: [PATCH 1/2] modsign: don't use bashism in sh scripts. · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-28
Re: [PATCH 1/2] modsign: don't use bashism in sh scripts. · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-10-02
[patch] MODSIGN: Fix build error with strict typechecking · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2012-10-03
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Mimi Zohar <hidden> · 2012-09-27
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Rusty Russell <hidden> · 2012-09-28
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2012-09-28
Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2012-09-28

Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2012-09-29 07:17:20
Also in: lkml

Rusty Russell [off-list ref] wrote:

I noticed the Cert number didn't change with rebuilds: "distclean"
didn't remove some files:

$ git clean -f -f -x -d
Removing extra_certificates
Removing signing_key.priv
Removing signing_key.x509
Removing signing_key.x509.keyid
Removing signing_key.x509.signer
Removing x509.genkey

I'm not sure whether distclean should remove those, since they can be
externally supplied, or whether x509.genkey should have a Makefile dependency
on kernel/Makefile.

I lean towards 'yes' when I'm altering kernel/Makefile trying to get things
right, and 'no' when I'm doing a make distclean to change my config or
changing kernel/Makefile for some unrelated reason.

David

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help