Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool

[PATCHSET] workqueue: reimplement high priority using a separate worker pool · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-09
[PATCH 1/6] workqueue: don't use WQ_HIGHPRI for unbound workqueues · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-09
[PATCH 3/6] workqueue: use @pool instead of @gcwq or @cpu where applicable · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-09
Re: [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: use @pool instead of @gcwq or @cpu where applicable · Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> · 2012-07-10
Re: [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: use @pool instead of @gcwq or @cpu where applicable · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-12
[PATCH 2/6] workqueue: factor out worker_pool from global_cwq · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-09
[PATCH UPDATED 2/6] workqueue: factor out worker_pool from global_cwq · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-12
[PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-09
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Fengguang Wu <hidden> · 2012-07-12
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-12
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-12
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tony Luck <hidden> · 2012-07-12
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-12
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tony Luck <hidden> · 2012-07-12
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-12
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tony Luck <hidden> · 2012-07-12
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tony Luck <hidden> · 2012-07-13
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Fengguang Wu <hidden> · 2012-07-13
Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-14
[PATCH UPDATED 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-14
Re: [PATCH UPDATED 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Fengguang Wu <hidden> · 2012-07-14
[PATCH UPDATED v3 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-14
[PATCH 5/6] workqueue: introduce NR_WORKER_POOLS and for_each_worker_pool() · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-09
Re: [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: introduce NR_WORKER_POOLS and for_each_worker_pool() · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-14
Re: [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: introduce NR_WORKER_POOLS and for_each_worker_pool() · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-07-14
Re: [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: introduce NR_WORKER_POOLS and for_each_worker_pool() · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-14
Re: [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: introduce NR_WORKER_POOLS and for_each_worker_pool() · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-07-14
Re: [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: introduce NR_WORKER_POOLS and for_each_worker_pool() · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-14
[PATCH UPDATED 5/6] workqueue: introduce NR_WORKER_POOLS and for_each_worker_pool() · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-14
[PATCH 4/6] workqueue: separate out worker_pool flags · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2012-07-09

From: Tony Luck <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-12 22:16:58
Also in: linux-xfs, lkml

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Tejun Heo [off-list ref] wrote:

I was wrong and am now dazed and confused.  That's from
init_workqueues() where only cpu0 is running.  How the hell did
nr_running manage to become non-zero at that point?  Can you please
apply the following patch and report the boot log?  Thank you.

Patch applied on top of next-20120712 (which still has the same problem).

dmesg output attached

-Tony

Attachments

dmesg.txt [text/plain] 23573 bytes · preview

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help