Re: sha-512...

From: Herbert Xu <redacted>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:16:08 +1100

OK, so we grew by 1136 - 888 = 248.  Keep in mind that 128 of
that is expected since we moved W onto the stack.

Right.

I guess we could go back to the percpu solution, what do you
think?

I'm not entirely sure, we might have to.

sha512 is notorious for generating terrible code with gcc on 32-bit
targets, so...  The sha512 test in the glibc testsuite tends to
timeout on 32-bit sparc. :-)