On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:27:25PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Yes, probably. So I take it the assumption in HIFN that the
sg-list length matches req->nbytes is incorrect?
Where were you seeing the discrepancy? If it's at the point of
entry into the HIFN code then the bug is further up. If it's
within the HIFN code then I don't know where 12 came from either
since the ICV is not visible to it.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt