On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 02:52:34AM +0200, Frederik Sdun wrote:
this removes the the ? operator which is false nearly all the time.
These changes look good. Could you please resend them as
patches that can be directly applied and add a sign-off?
You can refer to Documentation/SubmittingPatches for detailed
instructions.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- aes.c.orig 2007-07-15 11:43:21.000000000 +0200
+++ aes.c 2007-07-16 01:56:49.000000000 +0200
@@ -156,9 +156,12 @@
p = (p << 1) ^ (p & 0x80 ? 0x01b : 0);
}
+
+ sbx_tab[0] = 0x63;
+ isb_tab[0x63] = (u8) 0;
Please kill that cast.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt