Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 4 authors, 2025-02-08

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] x86/sev: Fix broken SNP support with KVM module built-in

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: 2025-02-05 19:31:57
Also in: kvm, linux-crypto, linux-iommu, lkml

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025, Vasant Hegde wrote:
On 2/5/2025 8:47 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025, Vasant Hegde wrote:
quoted
quoted
@@ -3318,6 +3326,9 @@ static int __init iommu_go_to_state(enum iommu_init_state state)
 		ret = state_next();
 	}
 
+	if (ret && !amd_iommu_snp_en && cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP))

I think we should clear when `amd_iommu_snp_en` is true.
That doesn't address the case where amd_iommu_prepare() fails, because amd_iommu_snp_en
will be %false (its init value) and the RMP will be uninitialized, i.e.
CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP will be incorrectly left set.
You are right. I missed early failure scenarios :-(
quoted
And conversely, IMO clearing CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP after initializing the IOMMU
and RMP is wrong as well.  Such a host is probably hosed regardless, but from
the CPU's perspective, SNP is supported and enabled.
So we don't want to clear  CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP after RMP initialization -OR-
clear for all failures?
I honestly don't know, because the answer largely depends on what happens with
hardware.  I asked in an earlier version of this series if IOMMU initialization
failure after the RMP is configured is even survivable.

For this series, I think it makes sense to match the existing behavior, unless
someone from AMD can definitively state that we should do something different.
And the existing behavior is that amd_iommu_snp_en and CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP will
be left set if the IOMMU completes iommu_snp_enable(), and the kernel completes
RMP setup.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help