Re: [PATCH v10 06/50] x86/sev: Add the host SEV-SNP initialization support
From: Jeremi Piotrowski <hidden>
Date: 2023-11-08 08:22:06
Also in:
kvm, linux-crypto, linux-mm, lkml
On 07/11/2023 19:32, Tom Lendacky wrote:
On 11/7/23 10:31, Borislav Petkov wrote:quoted
And the stuff that needs to happen once, needs to be called once too.quoted
+ + return snp_get_rmptable_info(&rmp_base, &rmp_size); +} + static void early_detect_mem_encrypt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { u64 msr;@@ -659,6 +674,9 @@ static void early_detect_mem_encrypt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)if (!(msr & MSR_K7_HWCR_SMMLOCK)) goto clear_sev; + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP) && !early_rmptable_check()) + goto clear_snp; + return; clear_all:@@ -666,6 +684,7 @@ static void early_detect_mem_encrypt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)clear_sev: setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SEV); setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES); +clear_snp: setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP); } }...quoted
+bool snp_get_rmptable_info(u64 *start, u64 *len) +{ + u64 max_rmp_pfn, calc_rmp_sz, rmp_sz, rmp_base, rmp_end; + + rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_RMP_BASE, rmp_base); + rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_RMP_END, rmp_end); + + if (!(rmp_base & RMP_ADDR_MASK) || !(rmp_end & RMP_ADDR_MASK)) { + pr_err("Memory for the RMP table has not been reserved by BIOS\n"); + return false; + }If you're masking off bits 0-12 above...Because the RMP_END MSR, most specifically, has a default value of 0x1fff, where bits [12:0] are reserved. So to specifically check if the MSR has been set to a non-zero end value, the bit are masked off. However, ...
Do you have a source for this? Because the APM vol. 2, table A.7 says the reset value of RMP_END is all zeros. Thanks, Jeremi