Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] virt: sevguest: Add TSM_REPORTS support for SNP_{GET, GET_EXT}_REPORT
From: Jeremi Piotrowski <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-14 08:31:34
Also in:
lkml
On 8/14/2023 9:43 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The sevguest driver was a first mover in the confidential computing space. As a first mover that afforded some leeway to build the driver without concern for common infrastructure. Now that sevguest is no longer a singleton [1] the common operation of building and transmitting attestation report blobs can / should be made common. In this model the so called "TSM-provider" implementations can share a common envelope ABI even if the contents of that envelope remain vendor-specific. When / if the industry agrees on an attestation record format, that definition can also fit in the same ABI. In the meantime the kernel's maintenance burden is reduced and collaboration on the commons is increased. Convert sevguest to use CONFIG_TSM_REPORTS to retrieve the blobs that the SNP_{GET,GET_EXT}_REPORT ioctls produce. An example flow for retrieving the SNP_GET_REPORT blob via the TSM interface utility, assuming no nonce and VMPL==2: echo 2 > /sys/class/tsm/tsm0/privlevel dd if=/dev/urandom bs=64 count=1 | xxd -p -c 0 > /sys/class/tsm/tsm0/inhex hexdump -C /sys/class/tsm/tsm0/outblob ...while the SNP_GET_EXT_REPORT flow needs to additionally set the format to "extended": echo 2 > /sys/class/tsm/tsm0/privlevel echo extended > /sys/class/tsm/tsm0/format dd if=/dev/urandom bs=64 count=1 | xxd -p -c 0 > /sys/class/tsm/tsm0/inhex hexdump -C /sys/class/tsm/tsm0/outblob The old ioctls can be lazily deprecated, the main motivation of this effort is to stop the proliferation of new ioctls, and to increase cross-vendor colloboration. Note, only compile-tested. Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/64961c3baf8ce_142af829436@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch (local) [1] Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Dionna Glaze <redacted> Cc: Brijesh Singh <redacted> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <redacted> --- drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/Kconfig | 1 drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/Kconfig b/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/Kconfig index da2d7ca531f0..1cffc72c41cb 100644 --- a/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/Kconfig@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ config SEV_GUEST select CRYPTO select CRYPTO_AEAD2 select CRYPTO_GCM + select TSM_REPORTS help SEV-SNP firmware provides the guest a mechanism to communicate with the PSP without risk from a malicious hypervisor who wishes to read,diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c b/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c index f48c4764a7a2..5941081502e8 100644 --- a/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include <linux/miscdevice.h> #include <linux/set_memory.h> #include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/tsm.h> #include <crypto/aead.h> #include <linux/scatterlist.h> #include <linux/psp-sev.h>@@ -769,6 +770,78 @@ static u8 *get_vmpck(int id, struct snp_secrets_page_layout *layout, u32 **seqno return key; } +static u8 *sev_report_new(struct device *dev, const struct tsm_desc *desc, + size_t *outblob_len)
get_report and get_ext_report both have a:
lockdep_assert_held(&snp_cmd_mutex);
so you'd need to take that lock somewhere here.
Jeremi
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+{ + struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + const int report_size = SZ_16K; + const int ext_size = SZ_16K; + int ret, size; + + if (desc->inblob_len != 64) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + if (desc->outblob_format == TSM_FORMAT_EXTENDED) + size = report_size + ext_size; + else + size = report_size; + + u8 *buf __free(kvfree) = kvzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); + + if (desc->outblob_format == TSM_FORMAT_EXTENDED) { + struct snp_ext_report_req ext_req = { + .data = { .vmpl = desc->privlevel }, + .certs_address = (__u64)buf + report_size, + .certs_len = ext_size, + }; + memcpy(&ext_req.data.user_data, desc->inblob, desc->inblob_len); + + struct snp_guest_request_ioctl input = { + .msg_version = 1, + .req_data = (__u64)&ext_req, + .resp_data = (__u64)buf, + }; + + ret = get_ext_report(snp_dev, &input, SNP_KARG); + } else { + struct snp_report_req req = { + .vmpl = desc->privlevel, + }; + memcpy(&req.user_data, desc->inblob, desc->inblob_len); + + struct snp_guest_request_ioctl input = { + .msg_version = 1, + .req_data = (__u64) &req, + .resp_data = (__u64) buf, + }; + + ret = get_report(snp_dev, &input, SNP_KARG); + } + + if (ret) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + + *outblob_len = size; + no_free_ptr(buf); + return buf; +} + +static const struct tsm_ops sev_tsm_ops = { + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, + .report_new = sev_report_new, +}; + +static const struct attribute_group *sev_tsm_attribute_groups[] = { + &tsm_default_attribute_group, + &tsm_extra_attribute_group, + NULL, +}; + +static void unregister_sev_tsm(void *data) +{ + unregister_tsm(&sev_tsm_ops); +} + static int __init sev_guest_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct snp_secrets_page_layout *layout;@@ -842,6 +915,14 @@ static int __init sev_guest_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) snp_dev->input.resp_gpa = __pa(snp_dev->response); snp_dev->input.data_gpa = __pa(snp_dev->certs_data); + ret = register_tsm(&sev_tsm_ops, &pdev->dev, sev_tsm_attribute_groups); + if (ret) + goto e_free_cert_data; + + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, unregister_sev_tsm, NULL); + if (ret) + goto e_free_cert_data; + ret = misc_register(misc); if (ret) goto e_free_cert_data;