Re: [PATCH v12 43/46] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver
From: Peter Gonda <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-24 19:29:07
Also in:
kvm, linux-efi, linux-mm, lkml, platform-driver-x86
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:01 PM Dionna Amalie Glaze [off-list ref] wrote:
Apologies for the necropost, but I noticed strange behavior testing my own Golang-based wrapper around the /dev/sev-guest driver.quoted
+ +static int handle_guest_request(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, u64 exit_code, int msg_ver, + u8 type, void *req_buf, size_t req_sz, void *resp_buf, + u32 resp_sz, __u64 *fw_err) +{ + unsigned long err; + u64 seqno; + int rc; + + /* Get message sequence and verify that its a non-zero */ + seqno = snp_get_msg_seqno(snp_dev); + if (!seqno) + return -EIO; + + memset(snp_dev->response, 0, sizeof(struct snp_guest_msg)); + + /* Encrypt the userspace provided payload */ + rc = enc_payload(snp_dev, seqno, msg_ver, type, req_buf, req_sz); + if (rc) + return rc; + + /* Call firmware to process the request */ + rc = snp_issue_guest_request(exit_code, &snp_dev->input, &err); + if (fw_err) + *fw_err = err; + + if (rc) + return rc; +The fw_err is written back regardless of rc, so since err is uninitialized, you can end up with garbage written back. I've worked around this by only caring about fw_err when the result is -EIO, but thought that I should bring this up.
I also noticed that we use a u64 in snp_guest_request_ioctl.fw_err and u32 in sev_issue_cmd.error when these should be errors from the sev_ret_code enum IIUC. We can fix snp_issue_guest_request() to set |fw_err| to zero when it returns 0 but what should we return to userspace if we encounter an error that prevents the FW from even being called? In ` crypto: ccp - Ensure psp_ret is always init'd in __sev_platform_init_locked()` we set the return to -1 so we could continue that convection here and better codify it in the sev_ret_code enum.
-- -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)