Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] x86/sev-es: Disable IRQs while GHCB is active
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Date: 2021-06-11 14:20:43
Also in:
kvm, lkml, virtualization
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Date: 2021-06-11 14:20:43
Also in:
kvm, lkml, virtualization
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 04:05:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:11:37AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: Why not simply "sandwich" them: local_irq_save() sev_es_get_ghcb() ...blablabla sev_es_put_ghcb() local_irq_restore(); in every call site?
I am not a fan of this, because its easily forgotten to add local_irq_save()/local_irq_restore() calls around those. Yes, we can add irqs_disabled() assertions to the functions, but we can as well just disable/enable IRQs in them. Only the previous value of EFLAGS.IF needs to be carried from one function to the other.
Hmm, so why aren't you accessing/setting data->ghcb_active and data->backup_ghcb_active safely using cmpxchg() if this path can be interrupted by an NMI?
Using cmpxchg is not necessary here. It is all per-cpu data, so local to the current cpu. If an NMI happens anywhere in sev_es_get_ghcb() it can still use the GHCB, because the interrupted #VC handler will not start writing to it before sev_es_get_ghcb() returned. Problems only come up when one path starts writing to the GHCB, but that happens long after it is marked active. Regards, Joerg