[PATCH Part2 RFC v3 08/37] x86/traps: Define RMP violation #PF error code
From: Brijesh Singh <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-02 14:13:38
Also in:
kvm, linux-crypto, linux-mm, lkml
Subsystem:
the rest, x86 architecture (32-bit and 64-bit), x86 mm · Maintainers:
Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Andy Lutomirski, Peter Zijlstra
Bit 31 in the page fault-error bit will be set when processor encounters an RMP violation. While at it, use the BIT() macro. Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <redacted> --- arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h | 18 +++++++++++------- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
index 10b1de500ab1..29f678701753 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ #ifndef _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H #define _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H +#include <vdso/bits.h> /* BIT() macro */ + /* * Page fault error code bits: *
@@ -12,15 +14,17 @@ * bit 4 == 1: fault was an instruction fetch * bit 5 == 1: protection keys block access * bit 15 == 1: SGX MMU page-fault + * bit 31 == 1: fault was an RMP violation */ enum x86_pf_error_code { - X86_PF_PROT = 1 << 0, - X86_PF_WRITE = 1 << 1, - X86_PF_USER = 1 << 2, - X86_PF_RSVD = 1 << 3, - X86_PF_INSTR = 1 << 4, - X86_PF_PK = 1 << 5, - X86_PF_SGX = 1 << 15, + X86_PF_PROT = BIT(0), + X86_PF_WRITE = BIT(1), + X86_PF_USER = BIT(2), + X86_PF_RSVD = BIT(3), + X86_PF_INSTR = BIT(4), + X86_PF_PK = BIT(5), + X86_PF_SGX = BIT(15), + X86_PF_RMP = BIT(31), }; #endif /* _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 1c548ad00752..2715240c757e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c@@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ show_fault_oops(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long ad !(error_code & X86_PF_PROT) ? "not-present page" : (error_code & X86_PF_RSVD) ? "reserved bit violation" : (error_code & X86_PF_PK) ? "protection keys violation" : + (error_code & X86_PF_RMP) ? "rmp violation" : "permissions violation"); if (!(error_code & X86_PF_USER) && user_mode(regs)) {
--
2.17.1