Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: Add binding for Renesas 8T49N241
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-07-22 14:21:43
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-renesas-soc, lkml
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-07-22 14:21:43
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-renesas-soc, lkml
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:58 AM Alex Helms [off-list ref] wrote:
On 7/19/2021 3:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:20:00 -0700, Alex Helms wrote:quoted
Renesas 8T49N241 has 4 outputs, 1 integral and 3 fractional dividers. The 8T49N241 accepts up to two differential or single-ended input clocks and a fundamental-mode crystal input. The internal PLL can lock to either of the input reference clocks or to the crystal to behave as a frequency synthesizer. Signed-off-by: Alex Helms <alexander.helms.jy@renesas.com> --- .../bindings/clock/renesas,8t49n241.yaml | 190 ++++++++++++++++++ MAINTAINERS | 6 + 2 files changed, 196 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/renesas,8t49n241.yamlPlease add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.Thank you for the info. I'm new to the kernel process and appreciate your advice. I felt uncomfortable adding your Reviewed-By tag but since there were no changes to the dt portion of the patch, in retrospect I guess I should have added it. I'll keep this in mind for the future. Is there anything I need to do for this patch?
For v5, no. If there's a v6 posted, then add any tags. Rob