Re: [PATCH 08/27] clk: sunxi-ng: Add support for H6 DE3 clocks
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-12 12:20:29
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:46 AM Jernej =C5=A0krabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net=
wrote: Dne torek, 04. september 2018 ob 11:04:21 CEST je Chen-Yu Tsai napisal(a)=
:
quoted
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 3:27 PM Jernej Skrabec [off-list ref]wrote:quoted
quoted
Support for mixer0, mixer1, writeback and rotation units is added. Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <redacted> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> --- drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-de2.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
++
quoted
quoted
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-de2.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-de2.cb/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-de2.c index bae5ee67a797..4535c1c27d=
27
quoted
quoted
100644--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-de2.c +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-de2.c@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_GATE(bus_mixer1_clk, "bus-mixer1","bus-de",> 0x04, BIT(1), 0); static SUNXI_CCU_GATE(bus_wb_clk, "bus-wb", "bus-de", 0x04, BIT(2), 0); +static SUNXI_CCU_GATE(bus_rot_clk, "bus-rot", "bus-de", + 0x04, BIT(3), 0); static SUNXI_CCU_GATE(mixer0_clk, "mixer0", "mixer0-div", 0x00, BIT(0), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);@@ -38,6 +40,8 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_GATE(mixer1_clk, "mixer1","mixer1-div",> 0x00, BIT(1), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); static SUNXI_CCU_GATE(wb_clk, "wb", "wb-div", 0x00, BIT(2), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); +static SUNXI_CCU_GATE(rot_clk, "rot", "rot-div", + 0x00, BIT(3), CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); static SUNXI_CCU_M(mixer0_div_clk, "mixer0-div", "de", 0x0c, 0, 4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);@@ -45,6 +49,8 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_M(mixer1_div_clk, "mixer1-div", "d=
e",
quoted
quoted
0x0c, 4, 4,> CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); static SUNXI_CCU_M(wb_div_clk, "wb-div", "de", 0x0c, 8, 4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); +static SUNXI_CCU_M(rot_div_clk, "rot-div", "de", 0x0c, 0x0c, 4, + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); static SUNXI_CCU_M(mixer0_div_a83_clk, "mixer0-div", "pll-de", 0x0c,=
0,
quoted
quoted
4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);@@ -53,6 +59,24 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_M(mixer1_div_a83_clk, "mixer1-div=
",
quoted
quoted
"pll-de", 0x0c, 4, 4,> static SUNXI_CCU_M(wb_div_a83_clk, "wb-div", "pll-de", 0x0c, 8, 4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT); +static struct ccu_common *sun50i_h6_de3_clks[] =3D { + &mixer0_clk.common, + &mixer1_clk.common, + &wb_clk.common, + + &bus_mixer0_clk.common, + &bus_mixer1_clk.common, + &bus_wb_clk.common, + + &mixer0_div_clk.common, + &mixer1_div_clk.common, + &wb_div_clk.common, + + &bus_rot_clk.common, + &rot_clk.common, + &rot_div_clk.common, +}; + static struct ccu_common *sun8i_a83t_de2_clks[] =3D { &mixer0_clk.common, &mixer1_clk.common,@@ -92,6 +116,26 @@ static struct ccu_common *sun8i_v3s_de2_clks[] =
=3D {quoted
quoted
&wb_div_clk.common, }; +static struct clk_hw_onecell_data sun50i_h6_de3_hw_clks =3D { + .hws =3D { + [CLK_MIXER0] =3D &mixer0_clk.common.hw, + [CLK_MIXER1] =3D &mixer1_clk.common.hw, + [CLK_WB] =3D &wb_clk.common.hw, + [CLK_ROT] =3D &rot_clk.common.hw, + + [CLK_BUS_MIXER0] =3D &bus_mixer0_clk.common.hw=
,
quoted
quoted
+ [CLK_BUS_MIXER1] =3D &bus_mixer1_clk.common.hw=
,
quoted
quoted
+ [CLK_BUS_WB] =3D &bus_wb_clk.common.hw, + [CLK_BUS_ROT] =3D &bus_rot_clk.common.hw, + + [CLK_MIXER0_DIV] =3D &mixer0_div_clk.common.hw=
,
quoted
quoted
+ [CLK_MIXER1_DIV] =3D &mixer1_div_clk.common.hw=
,
quoted
quoted
+ [CLK_WB_DIV] =3D &wb_div_clk.common.hw, + [CLK_ROT_DIV] =3D &rot_div_clk.common.hw, + }, + .num =3D 12,It's best not to openly code these. It is error prone, like having an index beyond .num, which then never gets registered. Instead, please update CLK_NUMBERS and use that instead. sunxi_ccu_prob=
e()
quoted
can handle holes in .hws.I'm not sure this will work. All newly introduced indices are at the end,=
so
other arrays will still have same length (hole at the end). You will just claim that arrays are larger than they really are, which means bad things=
.
But I take any other suggestion. I really can't think of better solution.
Then maybe have macros for both cases instead? CLK_NUMBER_WITH_ROT / CLK_NUMBER_WITHOUT_ROT? ChenYu
Best regards, Jernejquoted
On the other hand, it can't handle holes in the ccu_reset_map. Hope we never have to deal with such an instance. ChenYuquoted
+}; + static struct clk_hw_onecell_data sun8i_a83t_de2_hw_clks =3D { .hws =3D { [CLK_MIXER0] =3D &mixer0_clk.common.hw,@@ -156,6 +200,13 @@ static struct ccu_reset_map sun50i_a64_de2_reset=
s[] =3D
quoted
quoted
{> [RST_WB] =3D { 0x08, BIT(2) }, }; +static struct ccu_reset_map sun50i_h6_de3_resets[] =3D { + [RST_MIXER0] =3D { 0x08, BIT(0) }, + [RST_MIXER1] =3D { 0x08, BIT(1) }, + [RST_WB] =3D { 0x08, BIT(2) }, + [RST_ROT] =3D { 0x08, BIT(3) }, +}; + static const struct sunxi_ccu_desc sun8i_a83t_de2_clk_desc =3D { .ccu_clks =3D sun8i_a83t_de2_clks, .num_ccu_clks =3D ARRAY_SIZE(sun8i_a83t_de2_clks),@@ -186,6 +237,16 @@ static const struct sunxi_ccu_descsun50i_a64_de2_clk_desc =3D {> .num_resets =3D ARRAY_SIZE(sun50i_a64_de2_resets), }; +static const struct sunxi_ccu_desc sun50i_h6_de3_clk_desc =3D { + .ccu_clks =3D sun50i_h6_de3_clks, + .num_ccu_clks =3D ARRAY_SIZE(sun50i_h6_de3_clks), + + .hw_clks =3D &sun50i_h6_de3_hw_clks, + + .resets =3D sun50i_h6_de3_resets, + .num_resets =3D ARRAY_SIZE(sun50i_h6_de3_resets), +}; + static const struct sunxi_ccu_desc sun8i_v3s_de2_clk_desc =3D { .ccu_clks =3D sun8i_v3s_de2_clks, .num_ccu_clks =3D ARRAY_SIZE(sun8i_v3s_de2_clks),@@ -296,6 +357,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id sunxi_de2_clk_i=
ds[]
quoted
quoted
=3D {> .compatible =3D "allwinner,sun50i-h5-de2-clk", .data =3D &sun50i_a64_de2_clk_desc, }, + { + .compatible =3D "allwinner,sun50i-h6-de3-clk", + .data =3D &sun50i_h6_de3_clk_desc, + }, { } };diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-de2.hb/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-de2.h index 530c006e0ae9..27bd88539f=
42
quoted
quoted
100644--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-de2.h +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun8i-de2.h@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #define CLK_MIXER0_DIV 3 #define CLK_MIXER1_DIV 4 #define CLK_WB_DIV 5 +#define CLK_ROT_DIV 11 #define CLK_NUMBER (CLK_WB + 1) --2.18.0