On 08/24, Chanwoo Choi wrote:

On 2016년 08월 24일 13:43, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

On 08/23, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:

quoted

So the saving is rather insignificant but the patch doesn't make
things worse and I'd say it might be worth applying.

Sounds good. This sort of information should be in the commit
text though. Talking about const doesn't make any sense to me.

Do you mean that 'const' is initconst secion?

No. Marking it as initconst in the patch is correct.

If possible, could you explain the anything
why you don't make sense about 'const'?

I'm just saying that the reasoning to move it from the text
section to the data section shouldn't be because of const. There
should be better reasons to do this, like size benefits.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project