Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clk: qcom: Add support for RPM Clocks
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-12 00:41:30
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
On 12/15, Georgi Djakov wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7b0e85eefe70 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c@@ -0,0 +1,290 @@ + +static int clk_rpm_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct clk_rpm *r = to_clk_rpm(hw); + unsigned long rate = r->rate; + int ret = 0; + + mutex_lock(&rpm_clk_lock); + + if (!rate) + goto out; + + if (r->branch) + rate = !!rate; + + ret = clk_rpm_set_rate_active(r, rate); + + if (ret) + goto out; + +out: + if (!ret) + r->enabled = true; + + mutex_unlock(&rpm_clk_lock); + + return ret; +}
I don't see any "peer" code in this file. Is there a reason we're leaving out the active only vs active + sleep set style clocks? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project