Re: [PATCH 6/8] mmc: dw_mmc: Generic MMC tuning with the clock phase framework
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
Date: 2015-09-16 14:52:40
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mmc, linux-rockchip, lkml
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2015, 11:30:26 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
On 09/16/2015 07:09 AM, Heiko St=FCbner wrote:quoted
Am Dienstag, 15. September 2015, 17:25:38 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:quoted
On 09/01/2015 03:24 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:quoted
From: Alexandru M Stan <redacted> =20 This algorithm will try 1 degree increments, since there's no way=
to
quoted
quoted
quoted
tell what resolution the underlying phase code uses. As an added bonus=
, doing
quoted
quoted
quoted
many tunings yields better results since some tests are run more =
than
quoted
quoted
quoted
once (ex: if the underlying driver uses 45 degree increments, the tuni=
ng code
quoted
quoted
quoted
will try the same angle more than once). =20 It will then construct a list of good phase ranges (even ranges t=
hat
quoted
quoted
quoted
cross 360/0), will pick the biggest range then it will set the sample_c=
lk to
quoted
quoted
quoted
the middle of that range. =20 We do not touch ciu_drive (and by extension define default-drive-=
phase).
quoted
quoted
quoted
Drive phase is mostly used to define minimum hold times, while on=
e could
quoted
quoted
quoted
write some code to determine what phase meets the minimum hold ti=
me (ex
quoted
quoted
quoted
10 degrees) this will not work with the current clock phase framewor=
k
quoted
quoted
quoted
(which floors angles, so we'll get 0 deg, and there's no way to know wha=
t
quoted
quoted
quoted
resolution the floors happen at). We assume that the default driv=
e
quoted
quoted
quoted
angles set by the hardware are good enough. =20 If a device has device specific code (like exynos) then that will=
still
quoted
quoted
quoted
take precedence, otherwise this new code will execute. If the dev=
ice
quoted
quoted
quoted
wants to tune, but has no sample_clk defined we'll return EIO with an e=
rror
quoted
quoted
quoted
message.=20 Which point is "_generic_"? I don't find the code that control the=
quoted
quoted
register relevant to CLK_DRV/SMPL PHASE. It seems that posted the similar p=
atches
quoted
quoted
at u-boot mailing list..=20 The "generic" part is that it uses the clk phase API for dw_mmc implementations where the clkgen controlling interface is outside t=
he
quoted
dw_mmc IP itself. So it's open for other implementations as well.=20 Designware IP also has the CLK phase register(UHS_REG_EXT register)..=
.
if this code is related with it, it should be located into dw-mmc.c.
UHS_REG_EXT is acutally "reserved" on both the rk3288 as well as the rk= 3368.=20 rk3036/rk3128 (Cortex-A7) provide a bit description, but the tuning=20 documentation still uses the controls located in the clock controller. So I guess UHS_REG_EXT is the real "generic" solution.
quoted
But if you are more comfortable with it, I can also move it into th=
e
quoted
dw_mmc- rockchip variant for the time being, until another user com=
es
quoted
along.I think more better that this code is located into dw_mmc-rockchip. h=
ow
about?
As described above, moving that to the rockchip part sounds sensible. A= nd I=20 guess we can think more about it, once a second user appears. Heiko