Re: [PATCH RFC RFT 3/3] clk: introduce CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF flag
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-11 18:17:24
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2015-08-11 03:11:05)quoted
Hi Maxime, On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Maxime Coquelin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
How can we pass CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF flag to a specific clock on STi platform?Add the flag to the relevant clocks in the C code, e.g. in clk_register_flexgen(): if (!strcmp(name, "clk-icn-cpu")) init.flags |= CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF;quoted
Could we imagine having a kind of "clocks-enable-hand-off" property we could use in our clock controller DT node?You can imagine doing "flex_flags |= CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF" in st_of_flexgen_setup(), depending on the presence of such a property.This is precisely what Lee is trying to avoid. The would constitute a hand-rolled, open-code, gather-and-mark exercise that drivers would have to re-invent each time. (rough paraphrase of what Lee said)
Thanks.
I think that we can come up with a reasonable DT wrapper around the flag. I will be ecstatic if we can agree that the meaning of the flag can be tweaked just a bit to mean, "prevent this critical clock from being disabled, as it was enabled out of reset or by the bootloader, until a driver claims it and calls clk_prepare_enable".
Easy, how about: 'prevent_this_critical_clock_from_being_disabled_as_it_was_enabled_out_of_reset_or_by_the_bootloader_until_a_driver_claims_it_and_calls_clk_prepare_enable' Or I could come up with something else? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog