linux-cifs archive · May 2016

97 messages across 29 threads, ordered by last activity .

• STALE3768d [PATCH v22 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)
  2016-05-31 11:53 · 22 replies this month · Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
• DORMANTno replies Hello
  2016-05-29 00:44 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] posix acls: Move namespace conversion into filesystem / xattr handlers
  2016-05-27 18:37 · 0 replies this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] posix acls: Move namespace conversion into filesystem / xattr handlers
  2016-05-27 18:18 · 0 replies this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• STALE3759d [PATCH] Making shares unaccessible at root level mountable (aka solving bsc#8950 ...again)
  2016-05-27 17:43 · 0 replies this month · Aurélien Aptel <hidden>
• STALE3773d [PATCH 1/2] cifs: use CIFS_MAX_DOMAINNAME_LEN when converting the domain name
  2016-05-26 18:31 · 3 replies this month · Jerome Marchand <hidden>
• STALE3773d Re: [PATCH] posix acls: Move namespace conversion into filesystem / xattr handlers
  2016-05-26 11:36 · 1 reply this month · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH] cifs: stuff the fl_owner into "pid" field in the lock request
  2016-05-25 11:04 · 0 replies this month · Sachin Prabhu <hidden>
• STALE3775d [PATCH] posix acls: Move namespace conversion into filesystem / xattr handlers
  2016-05-24 22:40 · 10 replies this month · Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH] cifs: stuff the fl_owner into "pid" field in the lock request
  2016-05-24 19:08 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Shilovsky <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] cifs: stuff the fl_owner into "pid" field in the lock request
  2016-05-24 10:27 · 0 replies this month · Jeff Layton <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH v21 00/22] Richacls
  2016-05-23 01:20 · 0 replies this month · James Johnston <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [GIT] CIFS Fixes
  2016-05-21 00:07 · 0 replies this month · Steve French <hidden>
• STALE3779d linux-next: build failure after merge of the security tree
  2016-05-20 03:07 · 3 replies this month · Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the cifs tree
  2016-05-19 23:41 · 0 replies this month · Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH] CIFS: Remove some obsolete comments
  2016-05-19 18:31 · 0 replies this month · Sachin Prabhu <hidden>
• STALE3780d linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree
  2016-05-19 02:02 · 1 reply this month · Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] CIFS: Remove some obsolete comments
  2016-05-19 01:57 · 0 replies this month · Steve French <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] cifs: Create dedicated keyring for spnego operations
  2016-05-19 01:08 · 0 replies this month · Steve French <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies proposal
  2016-05-18 03:40 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [git pull] vfs.git#sendmsg.cifs
  2016-05-17 23:34 · 0 replies this month · Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
• DORMANTno replies [GIT] CIFS Fixes
  2016-05-17 22:36 · 0 replies this month · Steve French <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] cifs: Create dedicated keyring for spnego operations
  2016-05-17 15:35 · 0 replies this month · Sachin Prabhu <hidden>
• STALE3782d [PATCH] [SMB3] remove directory incorrectly tries to set delete on close on non-empty directories
  2016-05-17 15:19 · 1 reply this month · Steve French <hidden>
• STALE3782d [PATCH] fs: Add MODULE_SOFTDEP declarations for hard-coded crypto drivers
  2016-05-17 15:00 · 1 reply this month · Ben Hutchings <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies duplicate extents SMB3 fcntl and cp --reflink from cifs.ko
  2016-05-16 16:54 · 0 replies this month · Steve French <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies (unknown)
  2016-05-15 06:00 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE3789d [PATCH v21 00/22] Richacls
  2016-05-10 16:04 · 26 replies this month · Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
• DORMANTno replies STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.
  2016-05-07 06:22 · 0 replies this month · Acct. Dept. Bank Of China <hidden>