Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2021-12-14

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document mux-states property

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-12-13 20:19:54
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-phy, lkml

On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 06:40:01PM +0530, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On some boards, for routing CAN signals from controller to transceivers,
muxes might need to be set. This can be implemented using mux-states
property. Therefore, document the same in the respective bindings.

Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml    | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
index 6107880e5246..5b2b08016635 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
@@ -37,6 +37,18 @@ properties:
       max bit rate supported in bps
     minimum: 1
 
+  mux-states:
+    description:
+      mux controller node to route the signals from controller to
+      transceiver. Depending on the mux chip and the control lines
+      in it, the first and second parameters can be used for
+      representing control line and state. The number of arguments
+      is to be used based on '#mux-state-cells' property in the
+      mux-controller node. If '#mux-state-cells' is equal to
+      one then, then the argument to be used would be the state.
+      If it is set to two, then the first argument is the control
+      line and the second argument would be its corresponding state.
No need to redefine how a common property works here. What you do need 
to define is how many entries and what they are for if more than 1. 

Rob
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help